Dominance without Hegemony : History and Power in Colonial India /
by Ranajit Guha
- 1st ed.
- Cambridge, MA ; London : Harvard University Press, 1997.
- xvii, 245 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
- Convergences .
Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-231) and index.
Summary: What is colonialism and what is a colonial state? Ranajit Guha points out that the colonial state in South Asia was fundamentally different from the metropolitan bourgeois state which sired it. The metropolitan state was hegemonic in character, and its claim to dominance was based on a power relation in which persuasion outweighed coercion. Conversely, the colonial state was non-hegemonic, and in its structure of dominance coercion was paramount. Indeed, the originality of the South Asian colonial state lay precisely in this difference: a historical paradox, it was an autocracy set up and sustained in the East by the foremost democracy of the Western world. It was not possible for that non-hegemonic state to assimilate the civil society of the colonized to itself. Thus the colonial state, as Guha defines it in this closely argued work, was a paradox--a dominance without hegemony.
9780674214835
Civil service--India--History. India--History--British occupation, 1765-1947. India--Politics and government--1765-1947.